• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Captain Psychology

  • Topics
  • Notes
  • Videos
  • Syllabus

ktangen

April 5, 2023 by ktangen

100 Fact Terms

100 Things To Know About Facts

FactsKey Terms

 

  • 1 hour a day
  • 3 laws of association
  • acronyms
  • acrostics
  • age-dependent loss of memory function
  • alphabet-concrete image
  • alphabet-rhyme
  • Aristotle
  • attentional focus
  • backward chaining
  • Baddeley, Alan
  • bottom-up processing
  • Broadbent’s filter theory
  • Cabrera’s four universal metacognitive skills
  • Calkins, Mary
  • chunk
  • central executive
  • change blindness
  • context dependent learning
  • Clever Hans
  • cocktail party effect
  • complete memory
  • context reinstatement
  • cued recall
  • CVC (consonant-vowel-consonant) words
  • distinctiveness
  • distort new information
  • distributed practice
  • don’t forget (keeping them in memory)
  • double-blind study
  • Ebbinghaus, Hermann
  • editing
  • elaboration
  • elaboration mnemonics
  • empty gap
  • encoding specificity principle
  • episodic buffer
  • episodic memory
  • faces, snowflakes & inkblots
  • far transfer
  • forgetting curve
  • forward chaining
  • free recall
  • hippocampus
  • invisible gorilla
  • Jacobs, Joseph
  • journey method
  • Jung, Carl
  • lexical retrieval
  • location context
  • Locke, John
  • Loftus, Elizabeth
  • mental retardation
  • method of loci
  • Miller, George
  • multitasking
  • naïve mnemonics
  • near transfer
  • negative recognition
  • number-rhyme
  • number-shape
  • ode mnemonics
  • paired associates
  • peg system
  • phonological loop
  • photographs
  • primacy effect
  • primary distinctiveness
  • priming
  • recency effect
  • recognition errors
  • reduction mnemonics
  • repeated retrieval
  • savings
  • secondary distinctiveness
  • serial recall
  • serial position effect
  • state dependent cues
  • single-blind study
  • snowflakes, inkblots & faces
  • source monitoring
  • splitting
  • Stroop effect
  • Tangen’s Ten Tips
  • technical mnemonics
  • tip of tongue phenomenon
  • top-down processing
  • total time hypothesis
  • translation schemes
  • Tulving
  • unidirectional
  • visualization
  • visuo-spatial sketchpad
  • vividness of images
  • von Restorff effect
  • wax tablet
  • working memory
  • Zeigarnik effect
  • trained mind
  • link & story systems

Filed Under: Learning

April 5, 2023 by ktangen

Research Methods

Research methods includes library and lit reviews.
The quality of our results depends on our research methods. We only get sensible results if our methodology makes sense.

At its core, research is the search for causality. It is applying the rules of systematic observation to people watching. We want to know if A causes B. Sometimes we can manipulate or change the value of A and see what happens to B. But it is not always that simple.

[Read more…] about Research Methods

Filed Under: Topics

April 5, 2023 by ktangen

What Is Learning

What Is Learning?

 

When Wilhelm Wundt (pictured) started researching perception in humans, it was the beginning of what became psychology. Over the years, psychology has expanded to cover the study of all human behavior. It covers everything people do but the focus is on the individual. What causes you to act or not act in a particular way?

Perception focuses on what you sense, what you perceive and what you do about it. Biological psychology looks at how your genetics and physiology impact you. Consciousness, sleep and altered states ask how do you know you’r you?

 

Lifespan psychology tracks you from prenatal development through childhood, adolescence, adulthood, aging and death. Statistics ask how your performance compares to other people.

It is no surprise, then, that learning focuses on you: how you learn, why you learn and why you forget. It helps explain why you get afraid, and why you respond well to smiles and not so well to frowns.

 

Learning occurs naturally, yet mysteriously. Why do we remember things we don’t want to remember and forget things we want to retain? Why is it easy to learn languages as infants but not as adults?

 

It turns out that learning is easier than you think and more complicated.

Learning is about change. Not permanent change, not flickering, but persistent. Once learned, we tend to remember a name, face or word, even if it is less well over time.

Learning is also about experience. The change in knowledge or activity is due to our experience. We encounter a situation and are better able to handle it the next time we meet it. Learning assumes a fairly stable environment. We take advantage of the repeatability of life. Novel environments require us to use all of our mental ability. Familiar environments don’t require such a heavy cognitive load.

Driving a car is difficult at first. It requires sustained attention, concentrated effort and full-fledged thinking. Experienced drivers do it without much thought. You get in the car, get out of the car and the other end, and don’t think much in-between unless something unusual grabs your attention.

The systems of learning and memory and remarkably consistent. Except for diseases and accidental damage, your brain will effectively work. your whole life. It loses some cells and gets more efficient; it’s hard to tell which causes which.

Some people report they don’t learn as fast as they did when they were young. But they don’t recall what it is like to be young, how much time they used to spend on a task, or how well they are currently doing. We are not good trackers of our processes.

 

It is much clearer than our muscles get weaker as we age. Eyes don’t work as well, legs get a bit unsteady and backs aren’t as straight. But the brain is not a muscle. It is more like a computer than anything else. If it stays healthy, it doesn’t deteriorate in the same way or at the same rate as the rest of the body. So learning is a lifetime process.

 

Learning is not one thing. People talk about learning as if it is a single process. They think that learning state capitals is the same as learning how to swim. They assume that there is a single machine or mechanism at work. Learning is simple, right?

Learning is experienced as a single, easy process. But it is a complex combinations of multiple processes working incredibly fast; so fast it seems like a single system. We’ll look at all aspects of this fascinating process. We’ll enjoy its complications, and look for ways of simplifying it enough to be useful.

 

 

Filed Under: Learning

April 5, 2023 by ktangen

What Is Context

Context is a version of pattern recognition. In writing, it is how words are woven together. It is the combination of all the word connections. In perception, context is finding yourself in relation to the world around you. It is how you, objects and places relate to each other. Context is the whole that is larger than the sum of its parts.

People are very good at tracking their environments. We collect lots of data on where we are, how close we are to objects and the spatial relationships between everything. We use this information to decide what to do in any given circumstance.

Context cues allow us to discriminate between a baseball field, a synagogue and our backyard patio. The cues tell us that this place feels like home and that place feels strange and uncomfortable.

As it turns out, we recall best when the encoding and decoding contexts are the same. If we learn in a quiet environment, we do best when we recall in a quiet environment. We entered the information with quiet cues, so it is easiest to retrieve them when those cues are present.

The general principle of matching learning and recall contexts is called the Encoding Specificity Principle. Endel Tulving, a Canadian psychologist, found that performance on cued recall of word lists was improved when the encoding and decoding contexts matched. If you learn a list in one location, you remember it best if you are in that location when you are given a cue to remember a particular word.

Tulving suggests that you need to be in “retrieval mode” during recall. You must be trying to use all the cues you have available to help you remember. If you know the material, you don’t need any cues. But if you’ve ever taken a class in a quiet room and find yourself looking around hoping an answer will pop into your head, you probably should not have studied with your music blaring.

In the 1970s, educators were freaking out. They were worried that students wouldn’t perform well if they didn’t take the test in the exact classroom they learned it in. What if you have to take the SATs in the cafeteria? What if learning it in school meant you couldn’t apply it in real life?

The Encoding Specificity Principle isn’t that exact. We do best when the contexts match, and less well when they are less similar, but that isn’t the whole story. It depends on the material you are learning and the way you test its recall.

In recognition tests, context and environment cues don’t help much. Since all the information you need is present on the test, you don’t need other cues as much. In free recall (remember them in any order), environmental cues are more helpful, particularly for episodic memories.

People who go back to the house they grew up in are often flooded with memories. Everything seems to rush back. It can be overwhelming when the home has the same lighting, furniture, smells and sounds. People experience this overload at class reunions, revisiting battlefields, and visiting a previous employer.

On a smaller scale, context clues help us learn. When reading a book, we might remember what is at the top of page 34. In a classroom, we might remember a point because the prof circled it with colored chalk. During a game, we find the home team advantage is our familiarity with the court.

Our senses provide us with both top-down and down-up processing. Down-up is inductive. We sense the world around us and build those sensations into complex patterns. We also use deductive reasoning to process things top-down. We look ahead to see what is coming our way.

It seems like every hunting season comes with a story of a tragedy or a near miss for shooting a fellow hunter. Typically, one hunter is stationary and the other drives the deer toward him for an easy kill. Unfortunately, the stationary hunter might shoot at movements in the bushes only to discover that he has wounded or killed his partner. If we expect to see deer, we see deer, even if they are dressed in orange.

 

Stroop effectThe Stroop Effect is another good example of top-down processing. If I give you a list of colors all written in black, and ask you to read them aloud, you probably would have no difficulty doing so. If I give you a list of colors all written in their respective colors, you probably would have no difficult saying them aloud. If I give you list of colors written in the wrong colors and ask you to say the color they are written in (not the word but the color), you will find you’re quite slow at processing this information. Your brain recognizes them as words and wants to process them as words. This is top-down processing.

Similarly, if I show you an ambiguous item, you will use context to decide it if is a word or a number. Our brains actively look for words. We process words and numbers in different regions, so we look ahead to see what is coming our way. We decide if it is a b or a 13 depending on its context.

We use context to extract meaning when we read. When movie reviews or political ads take comments out of context, they misrepresent the statement because they have stripped it of its context.

In addition to all of the external cues, internal cues impact us too. In contrast to the external context-dependent cues (location, noise, music, wall colors, etc.), we also experience internal states, such as mood and pain. These internal factors are called state-dependent cues.

The Encoding Specificity Principle suggests that internal states can act as cues. In general, things that are emotional are more easily remembered. Advertisers and politicians often seek to make you feel something so you will remember their message better.

In 1964, Lyndon Johnson was in a race again Barry Goldwater for the American Presidency. Johnson’s campaign ran a television ad called Daisy. It opens with a 3-year old in a field with chirping birds. She is counting until a male voice begins a ballistic missile countdown and an atomic bomb is exploded. Johnson’s voice never mentions Goldwater but the impression is that Goldwater will bring on a nuclear war and kill all of your children.

Not quite as dramatically, advertisers show people having fun while using their products. The context and subtext is that if you use their products you too will be good looking, have plenty of dates, become rich and relax on a warm beach.

Emotion impacts our recall. When you are happy, you remember best the things you learned when you were happy. When you are depressed, you remember all of the ways people have been mean to you in the past, how lousy your life currently is, and how bleak your future looks.

An obvious application of state-dependent learning is how drugs impact us. When you are on your prescribed drugs, the things you learn will be remembered in that state. But if you go off your bipolar medications, you are unlikely to remember the same material well. When you go back on your meds, you remember the original material again.

When sober, people are not always able to remember where they put their keys when they were drunk. Getting drunk to remember won’t help because alcohol inhibits the encoding process. You probably didn’t learn much when you were drunk. The memory systems weren’t fully engaged.

Internal states include human motivation. Are you trying to meet basic needs or is your mental state focused on belonging and self-actualization? Your goals, wants and needs are all part of your internal mental context. They too impact your learning.

Filed Under: Learning

April 5, 2023 by ktangen

Encoding Specificity Principle

Encoding specificity principle in action: practice is realistic settings

The Encoding Specificity Principle has its roots in the earliest research of memory. When Ebbinghuas first used lists of words, he noted that associations between items aids recall. The internal context of the list matters. We look for any connection that helps us combine items into meaningful units.

Building on the work of Ebbinghaus, researchers using lists on nonsense syllables soon discovered that in addition to internal context, external context makes a difference. The environment can help you generate cues, and when you try to remember in a different environment (with different cues), it is more difficult.

The solution is to choose an encoding environment that is similar to where you must recall it. If you have to remember words on stage, it is best to learn them on stage. If you must remember how to do something under stress, practice it under stress. If you must take a test in a quiet environment, it is best to study in a quiet environment.

Tulving called this general principle of matching encoding and decoding contexts the Encoding Specificity Principle. It says that, in general, it is best to match your encoding context to the recall environment. If you must take a test without caffeine, it is best to study without caffeine. If you must perform in a hot environment, practice in a hot environment.

Tulving showed that retrieving episodic memories (stories of your life) is best when you recall them where you learned them. This is why people who return to their home town or old college can be flooded with memories. Cues they haven’t experienced for years are suddenly present, acting like magic keys to release locked memories. Being in the place where you learned things helps recall them.

For example, it is easiest to remember where your keys are when you are in the same room as they are. This is why when you’ve lost an idea, you go back to where you first had it and it reappears. The location context was giving you cues. Retracing your steps triggers those original cues that were present at encoding.

Location turn out to provide strong cues. This is why people in drug rehab find it so difficult to stay clean in their old haunts. Cues can act as triggers of emotional responses and, ultimately, a return to drug use. Stay out of places where you learned to be a druggie.

British memory researcher Alan Baddeley investigated cue-dependency by studying deep sea divers. The theory was that cold (the deeper you go underwater) acts a cue for learning. Eighteen divers did each of four conditions, counterbalancing the order is which they were presented. Since the divers each acted as their own control, a larger sample wasn’t needed.

The testing conditions were:

  • learning under water (20 feet below the surface) and recalling underwater
  • learning under water, recalling on land (by the shore)
  • learning on land, recalling on land
  • learning on land, recalling underwater

In this free recall test, divers remembered best when the learning and remembering conditions matched. The location context cues mattered. It didn’t matter whether it was underwater or on shore, only that the encoding and decoding contexts were the same.

The encoding specificity principle applies to music, smells, and ambient lighting. Matching input environment to output environment improves recall. When in doubt, match them.

But these external context-dependent cues aren’t immutable. You can overcome them. There are two main approaches to reinstating environmental context cues.

First, you can imagine you are underwater when you’re on shore. Baddeley had his divers close their eyes and visualize being underwater. Visualizing removed most of the blockage. Performance wasn’t as good as being underwater but quite close.

Obviously, your ability to visualize makes a difference. If can easily picture yourself in a location, mood or situation, you will do better than those who are less visually oriented. The trick is to consciously generate the environmental cues you’ll need at recall. It may help to take a picture of your classroom from where you sit and prop it up on your desk while you study.

Second, use multiple contexts. Study under quiet and noisy conditions. Study under bright and dim lighting. Study for recognition and recall. The more variations of environmental cues, the less impact they have. If you study in many contexts, none will overpower you.

The Encoding Specificity Principle extends to learning skills too. Learning transfers best between skills that are similar. Learning to sing probably won’t help your tap dancing. Learning your multiplication tables probably won’t help you carve pumpkins. The two skills are too far apart. Far transfer doesn’t work.

In contrast to the far transfer of widely different skills, near transfer aids performance. Waving your arms directing traffic will aid the arm waving ability to conduct an orchestra. The same muscles will get exercised. The same fluid motions will be trained. Remember Pat Morita’s role as Mr. Miyagi? Wax on and wax off are similar arm actions to the defensive moves in karate. This is near transfer.

The caution with near transfer is that it is best to avoid major incompatibilities. In the early days of aviation history, Beechcraft and Cessna had different control systems. In one you pushed the yoke forward to go up. In the other, you pulled it back. Pilots trained in one plane did fine flying the other plane until there was an emergency. When panic set in, pilots would push the controls in the wrong direction. My pilot friends tell me I made up this story but I like it anyway.

In general, pilots should fly. Dancers should practice more on their performance stages. Church choirs should practice where they will perform, not in a rehearsal hall in another building. Actors should have more dress rehearsals. Soldiers should have war games. Identify the performance conditions and match your training to them.

 

Photo by Specna Arms on Unsplash

Filed Under: Learning

April 5, 2023 by ktangen

Jefferson Out O f Context


Sometimes excepts of longer passages are good summaries. They give you the essence of the speech or book without requiring you to consume the whole tome.

But excepts can be misleading. A larger context provides the semantic cues and linguistic interactions to better interpret the meaning. In this sense, context gives meaning. [Read more…] about Jefferson Out O f Context

Filed Under: Learning

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 75
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Search

KenTangen.com

My Channel

Copyright © 2025 · Executive Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in